Hercules-Corona Borealis Great Wall is catalogued in this registry as a structure, held in the frame of CMB Rest Frame, from Large-scale structures (curated).
Registry id LSS_HCB_GREAT_WALL ·
source layer largescale ·
provenance PROCESSED — derived deterministically from source catalogues (unit, frame and epoch conversions, cross-source reconciliation) — no value invented
Open Hercules-Corona Borealis Great Wall in the live scene → The scene composes a position for any date and is where a figure becomes a picture. It downloads the whole catalogue first: measured against the built product, an object outside the core resolves after about 16 s over a local network and about 147 s over a 4 Mbit link, having transferred roughly 70 MB. If you cannot wait that long, this page is the answer.
| Kind | structure |
|---|---|
| Origin | natural |
Large-scale structure — wall. z = 1.85; comoving distance MODELLED from z (flat ΛCDM, Planck 2018: H0 67.7, Ωm 0.31) → ~5082 Mpc — a comoving distance is where the object sits NOW in the model, not how far its light travelled, so dividing it by c does not give a light-travel time. Anchor: z = midpoint of the published 1.6 ≤ z < 2.1 excess band; direction: the constellation region named by the follow-up paper ("half of the constellations of Bootes, Draco, and Lyra, and all of Hercules and Corona Borealis"). Extent: estimated "about 2000-3000 Mpc" across (the papers' own estimate). ⚠ direction INDICATIVE — the published localization is a ~1/8-of-the-sky region (14 of 31 GRBs at 1.6 ≤ z < 2.1), no centroid published. ⚠ existence CONTESTED: an independent reanalysis "provides little evidence for significant redshift-dependent clustering of GRBs" [Ukwatta & Woźniak 2016, verbatim] — shown with its rebuttal, not as settled. A claimed GRB overdensity at redshift ~2, proposed as the largest structure known; statistical reality disputed. [Horváth et al. 2014; Horváth et al. 2015; Ukwatta & Woźniak 2016]
Reproduced as the source wrote it. Author-year citations link to their DOI where one is registered.
These are absences in the catalogues aggregated here, not measurements of zero, and not statements that the quantity is unknown to science:
| Database | Large-scale structures (curated) |
|---|---|
| Authority | Published cosmography (Tully et al. 2014 Laniakea; de Vaucouleurs 1953; Raychaudhury 1989; Haynes & Giovanelli 1986; Lynden-Bell et al. 1988; Geller & Huchra 1989; Gott et al. 2005; Horváth et al. 2014/2015 + Ukwatta & Woźniak 2016; Kirshner et al. 1981/1987; Tully et al. 2008/2019; Keenan et al. 2013; Tully 1986 + Einasto et al. 1997; Pomarède et al. 2020; Clowes et al. 2013), anchors via SIMBAD/NED |
| Licence | Public astronomical facts (positions/redshifts/extents), per-record citations |
| How it entered | Curated data-as-code (src/ingest/catalogs/largescale.ts) |
| Coverage | 14 landmark structures above the galaxy-cluster scale — superclusters (Laniakea · Virgo/Local · Shapley · Perseus-Pisces · Pisces-Cetus complex), walls (CfA2 · Sloan · South Pole · the contested Hercules-Corona Borealis, shown with its published rebuttal), voids (Boötes · Local · KBC) + the Great Attractor and the Huge-LQG. Distances from z/cz are MODELLED through the flat-ΛCDM door (Planck 2018) and labelled; cosmological recession is the expansion of space, not motion through space — no drift is modelled |
This database remains the property of its owners and is reused under its own licence. If you quote a value from this page, name that database alongside SolarSystemRegistry.org.